Saptrishi Soni — A spate of public complaints has triggered alarm across Punjab, as citizens allege they were coaxed into sharing sensitive documents like Aadhaar, PAN cards, and voter IDs under the pretense of expedited enrollment in government schemes. In many cases, locals were reportedly asked for commissions to facilitate access to public services.
Unauthorized Camps Raise Red Flags
Punjab Police confirmed receiving numerous complaints over the past 24 hours. Fraudsters, posing as members of a political party, are said to be running “camps” that solicit personal data, including bank account details—leading to alarming incidents of bank accounts being emptied shortly afterward.
Police have launched statewide investigations, deploying district-level teams to inspect suspected venues, record witness statements, and trace perpetrators. Authorities strongly advised citizens to refrain from sharing personal data outside government-authorized channels.
The state government reiterated that all legitimate enrollment services are available through official Punjab Government “Seva Kendras” (Service Centres) and urged the public to immediately report any illegal operations to local law enforcement.
AAP’s Response: A Crime or a Campaign?
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) was quick to condemn the unauthorized data camps. AAP MLA Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal stated, “BJP is illegally collecting personal data from the public under the guise of central DBT (Direct Benefit Transfer) scheme registration.” He warned that such actions violate the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, and assured the public that police action would be stringent.
AAP emphasized that it would file criminal complaints against those responsible for organizing these camps and asserted that the affair reflects stark political misuse of citizen trust.
BJP’s Defense: Service or Subversion?
In contrast, the BJP defended its outreach. Party leaders claim their initiative—titled “BJP De Sewadar Aa Gaye Ne Tuhade Dwaar” (BJP Volunteers Have Come to Your Doorstep)—was merely aimed at helping people register for central welfare schemes, such as free rations, Ayushman Bharat, PM-Kisan, and women/youth benefits. They insist no wrongdoing occurred.
The party decried police detentions at several camps as politically motivated suppression by the AAP government. BJP alleged obstruction of its benevolent service by misuse of state machinery.
Congress Weighs In: A Fixed Political Duel?
Punjab Congress President Amarinder Singh Raja Warring entered the fray, denouncing both AAP and BJP for playing a “fixed match” that distracts from genuine governance. He accused them of manufacturing controversies to sideline Congress ahead of the 2027 Assembly polls and claimed both parties are colluding to weaken opposition.
Backdrop: Land Pooling Policy Fallout and Political Positioning
This crisis unfolds amid residual fallout from AAP’s now-withdrawn land pooling policy. Designed to acquire over 60,000–65,000 acres for urban development, the scheme promised farmers fractional residential and commercial plots in return—but drew heavy backlash for being exploitative.
AAP pulled the plug on the policy earlier this month following massive protests and a High Court stay order.
The BJP—and SAD—seized the moment, organizing farmers’ rallies and publishing blistering critiques of the policy as a “Ponzi scheme” or “land grab.” A September 1 “Jameen Bachao – Punjab Bachao Morcha” and a “Kisan Mazdoor Fateh Rally” reinforced their identity as pro-farmer champions.
Amid this context, BJP’s door-to-door scheme arguably serves dual purposes: public welfare and rural penetration ahead of the 2027 Assembly elections—a stronghold where AAP has already gained ground.
Political Stakes: Elections Loom Large
The 2027 elections are just around the corner, and both AAP and BJP appear locked in a battle for public trust and rural influence.
AAP, staying defensive, frames the controversy as criminal misuse of data and vows judicial intervention.
BJP, positioning itself as the farmer’s ally, counters with claims of “service” being obstructed by AAP. Their rural campaign machinery is gaining visibility.
Congress, sidelined for now, accuses both parties of manufactured confrontations.
With memories of the land pooling backlash still fresh, the tussle over data camps could reshape public perceptions about transparency, governance, and political accountability.
This episode underscores a troubling trend: India’s welfare mechanisms, intended to benefit ordinary citizens, are being co-opted for political ends. As Punjab hurtles toward 2027, safeguarding voter data and ensuring that government services remain accessible—and apolitical—is imperative.
AAP’s swift legal push, BJP’s assertive outreach, and Congress’ overt cynicism reflect the high-pitched stakes in this political theater. Whether the people of Punjab see this as delivery of services or exploitation of trust may well determine electoral outcomes in the near future.