Employees Crushed by Inflation, MPs Showered with Relief: The 2% vs. 24% Equation!
While the government has increased the Dearness Allowance (DA) for government employees by a mere 2%, it has raised the salaries and allowances of MPs by 24%. This contradiction has sparked anger among employees and the public. For employees, a 2% DA hike is like a drop in the ocean, while MPs—who already enjoy numerous benefits—receive a significant pay raise. Whenever it comes to providing relief to the common people, the government cites a “budget shortfall,” but for MPs, the treasury always remains open.
– Priyanka Saurabh
Inflation in the country continues to rise. Vegetable prices are skyrocketing, petrol and diesel rates are burning holes in pockets, and the common man is left wondering, “Which expenses will have to be postponed until the next salary arrives?” Amidst all this, the government has issued two separate relief packages for two different sections—government employees have been granted just a 2% DA hike, whereas MPs have received a 24% increase in their salaries and allowances.
This means that one section gets mere crumbs, while the other enjoys a lavish feast! This contradiction has caused deep resentment among employees and the public. The question arises: why does inflation seem to affect only MPs? This decision clearly appears to be taken in favor of those in power while depriving common employees and citizens of their rightful share. This issue has also made headlines in the media, with major news channels and newspapers featuring titles like “2% vs. 24% Discrimination.” Experts are calling this an anti-people policy of the government.
Just 2% for Government Employees—Is This a Joke?
The purpose of the Dearness Allowance (DA) is to provide relief to employees against rising inflation. But when retail inflation has surpassed 6-7%, how will a mere 2% DA hike benefit employees? This is akin to giving a hungry person just one biscuit and saying—”This should be enough for you!”
Government employee unions and associations are rightfully furious. They had long been demanding a fair salary hike and a reasonable DA increase, but the government treated it as an “avoidable expense” and granted only a nominal increment.
Now, employee organizations are raising some serious questions—
✔️ Has inflation increased only for MPs?
✔️ Why does the treasury seem empty when it comes to increasing DA for employees?
✔️ Has the contribution of ordinary employees become insignificant for the government?
24% Relief for MPs—At Whose Expense?
Now, let’s take a look at the condition of MPs. MPs already receive multiple allowances and perks, including:
🔹 Free air and rail travel
🔹 Government bungalows and offices
🔹 Staff support and security arrangements
🔹 Exclusive medical and pension benefits
Despite these extensive privileges, they have been granted a 24% salary and allowance hike. This one-sided decision signals an injustice towards the public and employees. The question arises—when the country is supposedly focusing on economic reforms, what is the justification for such a huge increase in MP salaries?
Public and Employees Speak—This Is Unfair!
Government employees and the general public are outraged over this decision. Social media has been flooded with memes and posts targeting the government. On Twitter and Facebook, people are saying—
📌 “Inflation affects everyone, but in the government’s view, only MPs deserve relief!”
📌 A government employee wrote: “Now even inflation has been classified into VIP and common categories!”
📌 Another tweet read: “If MPs can get a 24% hike, then why can’t the same formula apply to employees?”
This is not just about salary hikes—it’s time to question the government’s priorities. Every time the common people demand relief, the government declares the treasury empty. But when it comes to increasing MPs’ perks, there is never any concern about the budget!
Does This Happen in Other Countries?
If we look at other countries, strict regulations govern salary hikes for MPs in developed democracies. Generally, these increments are linked to inflation rates. In countries like the USA, UK, and Canada, MP salaries are determined by independent economic bodies and salary commissions, not directly by the government.
In India, MPs have the power to determine their own salaries and allowances, leading to this imbalance. This is why this issue keeps resurfacing, drawing public anger repeatedly.
What’s Next?
Government employee unions are now preparing for protests against this decision. Efforts are being made to put pressure on the Pay Commission and policymakers so that the DA hike is adjusted in line with inflation.
But the bigger question remains—will the government take any concrete steps to address this disparity, or will this issue fade away in a few days?
This decision has made it clear that the first claim on the hard-earned money of taxpayers belongs to the politicians. Why are employees and the public subjected to such double standards?
What do you think—
❓ Is this decision justified, or is it an insult to employees?
❓ Should MPs have the right to decide their own salaries?
❓ Will the government respond to public outrage, or will this be ignored as usual?
The government’s reaction to this issue is now being closely watched. From a political perspective, this controversy could fuel public dissatisfaction, providing opposition parties with an opportunity to attack the government. If the government tries to justify this decision, it could escalate resentment among employees and the middle class even further.
